Publié par : Malika Benarab-Attou | 25 octobre 2013

Rapporteur round-up: EU education systems in need of ‘new impetus’

By Katarína Neveďalová, Hannu Takkula, Malika Benarab-Attou, Inês Zuber, Kinga Göncz – 25th October 2013

Key rapporteurs on rethinking education Katarína Nevedalová, Milan Zver, Hannu Takkula, Malika Benarab-Attou, Inês Zuber andKinga Göncz give their responses to parliament’s adoption of the report in its Strasbourg plenary session.

Malika Benarab-Attou is parliament’s Greens/EFA group shadow rapporteur on rethinking education

This report was for us an opportunity to remind member states that education spending is a necessary investment in the future. They should be aware of their full responsibility to ensure that education is shielded from austerity measures. The report also recalls the primary mission of education as being the preparation of individuals for life, as well as for being active citizens in increasingly complex societies, while reinforcing the crucial role of lifelong learning for all.

Member states should consider the competences identified by the European commission as key for the development of learners, such as communication in the mother tongue, learning to learn and social and civic competences. It is also necessary that they use the tools developed at EU level, such as the European youth guarantee, which will require a significant level of funding and quality partnerships with the world of education, training centres, public services for employment and youth associations.

I regret, however, the strong focus on public-private partnerships with regard to the planning of curricula, the provision of guidance and the provision of education, training and specialisation, with a wide range of curricula which better set the demands of the labour market. We should better involve associations and professionals from local authorities in the planning of curricula as well as in the choice of methodology.

Inês Zuber is parliament’s GUE/NGL group shadow rapporteur on rethinking education

Rethinking education – yes, but not this way. To legitimise the decline in public investment in this sector, imposing online methods and the like as a standard solution and, thus lowering the quality of education. Not to suggest rethinking education debt of students to stop the debt school. Not rethinking an education system subject to market interests, to allow private interests to determine the curricula and educational content. We should never rethink education at the service of big capital.

Rethinking education – yes, but to ensure the right to education for the individual, the right to public education that is free and of high quality, with a public and collective investment of all and for all. That is what is needed.

Pour lire la suite, consulter l’article sur The Parliament.com.


Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s

Catégories

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :